Nodal Point of Thought 2024-06-13

Chatting in front of a whiteboard for two hours

Write down what you remember and get out of your mouth in the order you remember it later.

Strong impressions are adjoined by opportunities for bonding by

Opportunity to clarify one's values that have not yet been verbalized per se

Once you understand the composition of the game, you can't enjoy the game.

Some information is difficult to distribute.

Technology has accelerated the distribution of distributable information.

Scarcity decreases as they are duplicated.

commoditization

Abstraction makes it distributable.

Can the recipient receive and understand the abstraction product?

Easy to understand when accompanied by specific details

When you make an application, you end up abstracting once.

抽象を軸足にした変換.icon

What are some tips for good intellectual production?

Answers to general questions are more abstract.

The abstract answer is that you already know it, you just haven't connected it to the concrete in your mind.

for example

You just have to mess around a lot.

Increase the number of times you go to bat

MVP

PDCA cycle

We hear it so much that it's hard to hear, because it really is the truth.

After all, "Exercise is a good way to get rid of obesity."

There is no such thing as a good diet.

構想力は問題を限定する能力.icon

Creating a more narrowly focused question is necessary before getting an answer.

Organization with strong intellectual productivity

Inside and outside the organization

二重組織.icon

Some things can be financed with money and some can't.

People, goods, money, and information.

You often put these four things in parallel, but some of them are procurable with money and some are not.

Procurable = there is a market

Uncle just saying what he associates with.

human-vector search engine

I'm hoping to get new information and expand my network?

When I was younger than you are now, I was more inclined to do so, but I think it's weakening.

Uh, that one.

My physical body is foreseen to be in decline in 20 years.

As a result, the boundaries of "me" are changing.

I am the sum total of the information that has been made public.

Planting information (=a part of me) in another young, creative body is like bamboo extending its underground stem into another land

You're moving away from the physical body of the self in the way you emit your desire to grow.

In other words, it has changed from "the addition of new information to my physical body" to "the addition of new information to a body of knowledge (which I initially made public but which has lost its clear boundaries due to the involvement of various people).

Sources.

I'm losing time and energy to read books, and that's not good.

I'm tired and lazy on Twitter, not good.

I just hit the bookmark button and didn't write it in Scrapbox.

No clarification of collection criteria, etc.

The new is outside the delineated boundaries.

Delve into your interests until you are satisfied.

I liked having a white board.

There are certain types of concepts that are expensive to communicate when verbalized, but less expensive when illustrated.

On the other hand, it's hard to come up with "I see something about that in Scrapbox" in a verbal discussion.

Well, when I tell them, they're not going to read it on the spot.

In other words, the whiteboard and verbal communication is a "communication festival," a meeting to shake things up, break down boundaries of thought, and introduce new perspectives, after which each person may need a phase to deepen their distributed asynchronous thinking.

I guess we need another meeting to bring it up afterwards.

I wrote this so far on the train on the way home, so no graphical thinking.

-----

なめらか化.icon

指数的成長の後押し.icon

I thought there might be a J-curve.

Jカーブ.icon

Of course, theoretically there is.

https://gyazo.com/4789287f27cae07dce872f1dac336b52

Possibly a curve like B.

but it is agnostic because it is in the future

It's hard mentally to spend S's "uninteresting time" trying to get to B when there's an A curve in front of you.

Is it also influenced by the fact that my KPI in life is to maximize the good times in my life?

PS

新しいS字曲線に投資した方が得.icon

In the past, I've thought about this.

So the difference is whether you think the curve grows exponentially or sluggishly in an S-curve fashion.

Basically, history has been a series of S-shaped developments.

Exponential growth during the first half even with S-shaped

Further added 2024-08-03

Or can the A's compress the cost that the B's chose to pay in the S's time?

In the area of technology, for example, tools that were not well documented in the early days and had to be used through trial and error while reading and interpreting source code, are documented as they develop and later become easy to use.

Documentation is an easily transferable resource

On the other hand, the mental model built by that hardship s difficult to transfer resources

There are things that can be done by people who have this mental model and can do it "this way," but can't be done by people who entered the market after the library was in place.

https://gyazo.com/4c96a72abad4ed865b756c5fa93aedc2

Mr. P., who uses Tool X as a black box, doesn't develop his thinking.

Q who understands what's in it, does he develop thoughts?

By what mechanism?

Like, "I should be able to change the 'C' to a 'C'."

社会関係資本の使い方.icon

When you wrote this, you implicitly assumed your own pattern of m

In this story, I am not the M pattern.

I think I'm S.

https://gyazo.com/b02f8b4385e8ca15983739f4aee713be

Relay information to the source when the mediator observes a demand

Communication of information without market distribution

But this diagram seems a little off to me.

S is too passive.

Well, it's non-committal.

https://gyazo.com/db55c9d126b03d986a6b532ae882732f

First of all, I was originally one of the S's.

M was an active relationship builder with many Ss.

My job was as a consultant, so there must have been a lot of demand on the other side that S. couldn't see from me.

It started out like that, with a non-committal engineer getting involved with a consultant with strong involvement skills, and then I, who understood the value of getting involved, actively engaged in the act of getting involved, and that's how the first figure came to be.

https://gyazo.com/4f74a493b506810dfc0d49ff7b3dc9d7

Abstraction of interesting concrete examples

サイクルを閉じる.icon

This specific case itself is not that useful.

I saw this tweet and thought, "I see, I never thought of that idea."

Then why didn't I have the idea, something was missing, what was it that I was missing?

Abstraction.

https://gyazo.com/8aa4e08aff1f3b44fb97d3998f5d97fd

The original one connects A and C by cutting out B as the middle man.

Pointing out that "only different parities can be connected" is an assumption.

The rest of the article says, "One person can have both parities."

Pointing out that "either/or parity" is an assumption.

I've been thinking of things that aren't parity as parity.

You are making the mistake of assuming that attributes that are not transgressions are transgressions.

# Blind Spot Card Candidate

Scrapbox can [Stock of associations

Is there always value in associative links? Should we just create more and more links?

For example, it is not useful to write "book" on every book page

What is a useful link and what is not?

Anyone can look at a book and think "this is a book", commodity

When few people see A and associate it with B, isn't there value in linking A and B?

Something like connecting distant objects in the space of Embedding.

Why is it worth it?

Is it because connecting far away allows us to explore faster by following it?

I never finished reflecting on the two-hour meeting.

Because it's growing while we're looking back.

There's a vein of gold at the end of the dig.

Nothing.

A little something.

When you dig, you hit a big vein of gold.

I'm not passionate about it, but I dig it because I was told to dig it.

It's not my fault if I dig and find nothing.

It's my boss's fault for telling me to dig here, not mine.

Give me my paycheck for all the digging I do.

https://gyazo.com/9741473d5902e1e3115fbf992b3b61d7

I remember drawing a similar picture.

It was there, but a little different.

競争を避ける.icon

https://gyazo.com/6adf6b721f2577abb0903b42821fe352

Tried it once and didn't like it.

I'm the type of person who moves around and digs a lot.

Then fill in the gaps.

https://gyazo.com/9dc6240daf85cd5c675c92c473cfd47f

There are lots of gaps.

How deep do you dig into your interests and how far do you need to dig to be effective as a "specialty"?

Making the card usable.

What is a real bullet and what is a usable card?

Resources not easily acquired by others

Resources that cannot be procured in the market

It's like processing these goods to make them better weapons.

Not 0 or 1, but something that gets bigger and bigger.

0.9 is zero when truncated.

It becomes available when 1.

While you're using a 1 card, random events can grow it into a 2.

Crystals grow all at once with random stimuli.

There's no point in stimulating a lot of uncooled water.

The "cold state" is important.

It is pointless to create only bonding when there is no difference in the water surface.

[Connecting the Dots

Enrichment increases the probability of bonding occurring.

I don't know where to look to acquire what I don't know now.

Pulling back the analogy

アナロジー.icon

What you did before you knew this is what you did after the fact.

---